Court case

How the Volkswagen diesel emissions case unfolded

The US Department of Justice alleged that Volkswagen installed software in about 590,000 US diesel vehicles that detected emissions testing and reduced emissions controls during normal driving, misled US regulators and customers, and destroyed documents after the discrepancy was exposed.

11 January 2017 to today · 5 dated events · 6 sources
Where it stands now · as of 30 October 2026

As of 30 October 2026 Volkswagen AG's US conviction and German administrative fine stand as final, and no corporate appeal was identified.

2017
11 Jan 2017
Filing

Justice Department announces plea agreement and indictment of six individuals

Announcement of plea agreement and civil resolutions. Volkswagen agreed to plead guilty to three felony counts and pay a $2.8 billion criminal penalty, plus $1.45 billion to resolve EPA civil claims and customs fraud claims and $50 million in FIRREA civil penalties. Six executives and employees were indicted.

21 Apr 2017
Turning point
Ruling

Volkswagen AG sentenced

Sentencing of Volkswagen AG on guilty plea entered 10 March 2017. The court accepted the plea agreement and sentenced Volkswagen AG on conspiracy to defraud the United States, commit wire fraud and violate the Clean Air Act, obstruction of justice, and importation of merchandise by means of false statements. Sentence was a $2.8 billion criminal penalty, three years of probation and an independent compliance monitor, Larry D. Thompson.

· · · 14 months later
2018
13 Jun 2018
Ruling

Braunschweig prosecutor fines Volkswagen AG EUR 1 billion, accepted by the company

Administrative order imposing a fine under sections 30 and 130 of the German Act on Regulatory Offences. A EUR 1 billion fine, made up of a EUR 5 million penalty and EUR 995 million disgorgement, for breach of monitoring duties in powertrain development. The order concerned about 10.7 million vehicles with EA 288 (Gen3, US and Canada) and EA 189 (worldwide) engines sold between mid 2007 and 2015 with an impermissible software function. Volkswagen accepted it and did not appeal.

· · · 84 months later
2025
26 May 2025
Turning point
Ruling

Braunschweig court convicts four former Volkswagen managers

Judgment in criminal trial of four former Volkswagen managers, case 6 KLs 411 Js 49032/15 (23/19). The court convicted four former managers of fraud. Two received prison terms of four years six months and two years seven months, and two received suspended sentences, according to beck-aktuell and AP. The judgment was reported as not final, with the defence announcing an appeal on points of law. This concerns individuals, not Volkswagen AG as a defendant.

Related timelines

Sources

6 records, ranked by type
  1. 1Government document11 Jan 2017
    Volkswagen AG Agrees to Plead Guilty and Pay $4.3 Billion in Criminal and Civil Penalties; Six Volkswagen Executives and Employees are Indicted
    US Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs · justice.gov
  2. 2Government document21 Apr 2017
    Volkswagen AG Sentenced in Connection with Conspiracy to Cheat U.S. Emissions Tests
    US Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs · justice.gov
  3. 3Subject's own statement11 Jan 2017
    Volkswagen reaches settlements with U.S. government (Volkswagen AG press release via Publicnow)
    MarketScreener (Volkswagen AG release) · ca.marketscreener.com
  4. 4Subject's own statement13 Jun 2018
    Administrative order imposing a fine (Bußgeldbescheid) being issued by the Braunschweig public prosecutor against Volkswagen in the context of the diesel crisis (ad hoc release)
    Volkswagen AG · volkswagen-group.com
  5. 5News report26 May 2025
    German court convicts four ex-Volkswagen managers of fraud in emissions scandal
    Euronews (with AP) · euronews.com
  6. 6News report26 May 2025
    Frühere VW-Manager zu Haftstrafen verurteilt (LG Braunschweig, 6 KLs 411 Js 49032/15)
    beck-aktuell (Verlag C.H. Beck) · beck-aktuell.de

Last updated 30 October 2026. Spotted an error? See corrections. Every event links to the record it comes from. Allegations are attributed to whoever made them.