Court case

How the Johnson & Johnson talc litigation unfolded

Tens of thousands of plaintiffs allege in state and federal lawsuits that Johnson & Johnson talc products, including baby powder, caused ovarian cancer or mesothelioma. Federal cases are consolidated in a multidistrict litigation before US District Judge Michael Shipp in New Jersey.

30 January 2023 to today · 7 dated events · 10 sources
Where it stands now · as of 30 October 2026

As of 30 October 2026 J&J's proposed $5.5 billion ovarian talc settlement announced on 27 July 2026 had not been reported as meeting its 95 percent participation condition, and MDL deadlines were reported as held in abeyance while participation is reported to the court.

2023
30 Jan 2023
Turning point
Ruling

Third Circuit orders dismissal of first LTL bankruptcy

In re LTL Management LLC, No. 22-2003. The court ordered dismissal of the first Chapter 11 case of LTL Management, the J&J subsidiary holding talc liabilities, holding it was not in financial distress when it filed and so the petition was not filed in good faith.

· · · 18 months later
2024
25 Jul 2024
Ruling

Third Circuit affirms dismissal of second LTL bankruptcy

In re LTL Management LLC, Nos. 23-2971 and 23-2972 (non-precedential). The court affirmed the bankruptcy court's dismissal of LTL's second Chapter 11 petition for lack of financial distress.

2025
31 Mar 2025
Ruling

Red River Talc bankruptcy dismissed in Texas

In re Red River Talc LLC, No. 24-90505, ruling denying confirmation and dismissing the case. The court refused to confirm the prepackaged plan and dismissed the case, citing voting irregularities, a channeling injunction protecting more than 700 non debtors, and nonconsensual third party releases contrary to Harrington v. Purdue Pharma, according to summaries by Hogan Lovells and HarrisMartin.

2026
29 Jan 2026
Filing

Judge Shipp dismisses, without prejudice and with leave to amend, a suit alleging the bankruptcy strategy was fraudulent

Order granting motion to dismiss, Aronstein v. Kenvue, Inc., No. 3:24-cv-04665 (ECF No. 61, filed stamp 2 February 2026), with an accompanying memorandum opinion. Granted the defendants' motion and dismissed the amended complaint without prejudice, with leave to file an amended complaint within 45 days. Reuters reported the ruling on 29 January 2026 and said the court found the plaintiffs' claimed injury from delay was hypothetical.

22 Jul 2026
Ruling

MDL court orders all plaintiffs to show cause why their cases should not be dismissed for lack of admissible specific causation evidence

Order to Show Cause, MDL No. 16-2738 (MAS) (RLS), ECF No. 45696, with a memorandum opinion of the same date. Granted J&J's motion and ordered all plaintiffs to show cause within 120 days why their cases should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to point to admissible expert opinion on specific causation. J&J then has 90 days to respond and the magistrate judge will issue a report and recommendation. J&J and AP said this followed the withdrawal of specific causation experts in two bellwether cases.

27 Jul 2026
Settlement

J&J announces proposed $5.5 billion ovarian talc settlement

Announcement of proposed resolution of ovarian talc litigation. J&J committed $5.5 billion, paid per claim, for about 76,000 remaining ovarian claims, conditional on at least 95 percent participation, with a first payment of no more than $3 billion in 2027. It said it had previously settled about 95 percent of filed mesothelioma lawsuits.

28 Aug 2026
Turning point
Ruling

MDL deadlines held in abeyance with biweekly participation reports, as reported

Order holding deadlines in abeyance (reported). MDL deadlines, stayed on 29 July 2026, remained in abeyance, and negotiation counsel were directed to report to the court every two weeks on claimant participation in the settlement, according to MDL Update.

Related timelines

Sources

10 records, ranked by type
  1. 1Subject's own statement27 Jul 2026
    Johnson & Johnson Announces a Proposed Resolution of Ovarian Talc Litigation (Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K)
    Johnson & Johnson via SEC EDGAR · sec.gov
  2. 2Official record30 Jan 2023
    In re: LTL Management LLC, No. 22-2003 (3d Cir. 2023)
    Justia (reproducing Third Circuit opinion) · law.justia.com
  3. 3Official record25 Jul 2024
    In re LTL Management LLC, Nos. 23-2971 and 23-2972 (non-precedential opinion)
    US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · www2.ca3.uscourts.gov
  4. 4Source17 Apr 2025
    Johnson & Johnson's Red River Bankruptcy Strategy Sinks on Third-Party Release Issues, Voting Irregularities
    Hogan Lovells Cadwalader (law firm client publication) · hlc.com
  5. 5News report28 Jul 2026
    Johnson & Johnson proposes $5.5 billion talc settlement to end marathon legal fight (AP)
    KSAT (Associated Press) · ksat.com
  6. 6News report29 Jan 2026
    US judge tosses lawsuit accusing J&J of fraud over talc bankruptcy strategy (Reuters)
    Reuters (syndicated) · d2461.cms.socastsrm.com
  7. 7Source1 Oct 2026
    Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products MDL 2738 (case tracker)
    MDL Update · mdlupdate.com
  8. 8News report31 Mar 2025
    Bankruptcy Court Rejects Red River Talc's Prepackaged Reorganization Plan, Grants Motion to Dismiss
    HarrisMartin · harrismartin.com
  9. 9Official record22 Jul 2026
    In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 16-2738 (MAS) (RLS), Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 45696)
    US District Court for the District of New Jersey (copy posted by Robert King Law Firm) · robertkinglawfirm.com
  10. 10Official record2 Feb 2026
    Aronstein v. Kenvue, Inc., No. 3:24-cv-04665 (MAS) (RLS), Order granting Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 61)
    US District Court for the District of New Jersey (copy posted by ClassAction.org) · classaction.org

Last updated 30 October 2026. Spotted an error? See corrections. Every event links to the record it comes from. Allegations are attributed to whoever made them.