How the Duterte ICC case unfolded
The ICC Prosecutor alleges that Duterte, as Mayor of Davao City and later as President, is criminally responsible for murders and attempted murders committed as part of a widespread and systematic attack against civilians in the context of the anti-drug campaign between 1 November 2011 and 16 March 2019, through indirect co-perpetration, ordering or inducing, and aiding or abetting, according to reports of the confirmation decision.
As of 30 October 2026 Duterte is detained in The Hague awaiting trial, with the opening before Trial Chamber III scheduled for 30 November 2026.
30 November 2026 trial opening, ICC Trial Chamber III
Warrant is made public and Duterte is arrested in Manila
He is surrendered to the ICC in The Hague
Warrant of arrest for murder as a crime against humanity and surrender to the Court. The warrant was issued under seal on 7 March 2025 and made public on 11 March 2025, when Duterte was arrested in Manila. He was surrendered to the ICC on 12 March 2025 and made his initial appearance on 14 March 2025.
Confirmation of charges hearing opens and runs to 2026-02-27, with Duterte having waived attendance
Appeals Chamber affirms jurisdiction
Judgment on the defence appeal on jurisdiction. By majority rejected the defence appeal in its entirety and confirmed Pre-Trial Chamber I's decision of 23 October 2025 that the court may exercise jurisdiction over alleged crimes committed in the Philippines from 1 November 2011 to 16 March 2019, while it was a State Party. Judge Lordkipanidze appended a partly dissenting opinion.
Pre-Trial Chamber I confirms all charges and commits him to trial
Decision on the confirmation of charges. Unanimously confirmed all charges, three counts of crimes against humanity of murder and attempted murder under article 7(1)(a) of the Rome Statute, finding substantial grounds to believe Duterte is responsible, and committed him to trial. 539 victims were authorised to participate.
Trial Chamber III sets the trial opening for 2026-11-30
Status conference and scheduling decision. Scheduled the opening of the trial for 30 November 2026. The Presidency had constituted Trial Chamber III on 24 April 2026.
ICC makes public Trial Chamber III's decision of 2026-09-28 finding him fit to stand trial
Decision on fitness to stand trial, dated 28 September 2026 and made public on 8 October 2026. Found Duterte fit to stand trial on the basis of an independent panel of experts, which unanimously found he can understand the charges, follow the proceedings and instruct counsel, and ordered continuous monitoring of his health.
Sources
11 records, ranked by type- 1Official record23 Apr 2026ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I confirms all charges against Rodrigo Roa Duterte and commits him to trialInternational Criminal Court · icc-cpi.int
- 2Official record22 Apr 2026ICC Appeals Chamber confirms jurisdiction in Duterte caseInternational Criminal Court · icc-cpi.int
- 3News report23 Apr 2026ICC confirms charges against Philippines ex-president DuterteJURIST · jurist.org
- 4News report23 Apr 2026ICC confirms charges vs Duterte, orders trial to proceedManila Bulletin · mb.com.ph
- 5News report23 Apr 2026Four grounds of appeal: How ICC rejected Duterte's dismissal pleasThe Philippine Star · philstar.com
- 6News report13 Mar 2025Duterte takes responsibility for Philippines drug war in video messageAl Jazeera · aljazeera.com
- 7News report28 May 2026ICC sets Duterte trial on November 30Manila Bulletin · mb.com.ph
- 8News report9 Oct 2026Former Philippine President Duterte fit to stand trial, ICC saysGhana News Agency · gna.org.gh
- 9News report13 Oct 2026Former Philippine President expected to appear in 4th ICC status conferenceThe Star (Malaysia) · thestar.com.my
- 10Official record8 Oct 2026Situation in the Philippines: Rodrigo Roa Duterte fit to stand trialInternational Criminal Court · icc-cpi.int
- 11News report8 Oct 2026Philippines ex-President Duterte fit to stand trial, ICC rulesAl Jazeera · aljazeera.com
Last updated 30 October 2026. Spotted an error? See corrections. Every event links to the record it comes from. Allegations are attributed to whoever made them.